The United Nations + The World Bank = One World Government

Conservatives inside and out side of government find themselves in a state of shell shock. This is by design, of course. There are so many issues screaming for attention that none receive the attention they are due. Think about it. Who among you could not come up with a laundry list of topics that are not being addressed with the urgency you believe they deserve. We visit our favorite bloggers every day and it seems each one has another cause de jour and they ask: where is the outrage? The problem, of course, is that when we are being pulled in 100 directions at the same time, we end up going no where. That is the way the progressives and the big government elitist like it. It reminds me of the old adage: when you’re up to your arse in alligators it’s hard to remember that your original plan was to drain the swamp.

To make matters worse, while we are splashing around in our swamp trying to ward off a hundred or more American alligators, outside agencies like the UN and the World Bank think we will hardly notice if they turn loose a few more gators of their own into our swamp.

World Oceans Summit

Canada Free Press give us this heads-up:

The World Oceans Summit in Singapore is the latest platform for the United Nations World Bank to announce its latest assault on sovereign economic decisions and freedom. The oceans are suddenly very sick and “we need coordinated global action to restore our oceans to health,” says World Bank president Robert Zoellick.

The UN has decided that we need a new partnership to “confront the problems of over-fishing, marine degradation, and loss of habitat.” To achieve this goal, Zoellick proposes $300 million in “catalytic finance” from a coalition of countries, scientific centers, NGOs, international organizations, foundations, and the private sector.

Knowledge, experience, expertise, and investment will be gathered around a set of agreed upon goals. His next sentence, reveals the creator of this new scheme, the United Nations with its Agenda 21. Another $1.2 billion must be raised, he said, “to support healthy and sustainable oceans.” A “sustainable” anything is the buzzword for Agenda 21. The final total would be $1.5 billion in new commitments over five years. The group will reconvene in April 2012 in Washington, D.C. for further lobbying of U.S. funds.

No surprises here, is there? Our would be World Government wants the US and other developed nations to give up more of their wealth and sovereignty.to the benefit of the poorer nations. Maybe they didn’t get the message that the so-called developed nations are broke.

UN Agenda 21

This one just won’t go away. While many of you have been busy trying to ward off the influence of unelected promoters of “sustainable communities” on your local planning commissions. these Agenda 21 promoters are trying to take it to the next level: regional planning. The same Canada Free Press article reminds us:

All across the U.S. efforts are underway to pass Regional plans that erase boundaries between cities, counties, and states. “We are losing our ability to influence our government policies at the same time that we are being solicited for our opinion.” This is the Delphi method of manipulating and controlling groups that may protest. (Rosa Koire)

HB 430 will expand the “Regional Cooperation Incentive Fund” and allow the fund to offer an increased amount of government grant money to planning commissions that “consolidate or coordinate” with other local planners, thus regionalize.

Regionalization is a step towards globalization because it is an unelected, unaccountable layer of government in which municipalities become borderless groups. The unelected individuals will develop comprehensive plans of land use that supersede local laws and often disregard private property rights. This parasitic layer of government will then require the local community to bring their laws and zoning in line with their dictates.

Please be alert for HB 430 bills in your state or your local planning commissions will be receiving their orders from unelected regional Agenda 21 planners.

Law Of the Sea Treaty (LOST)

This is another of those “sounds good” ideas that won’t go away. The following was taken from a recent Daily Paul posts:

  • LOST threatens U. S. sovereignty. Not just a little or around the edges, but fundamentally. Once the U. S. became a party to the treaty, any number of issues could be adjudicated by a LOST tribunal.  It is not clear what the limits are on the issues that could be taken up by LOST.  Jurisdiction over anything that affects the oceans directly or indirectly could be asserted.  The majority of members of the tribunal adjudicating any particular issue are almost certainly going to be hostile to U. S. interests.  Tribunal decisions cannot be appealed.  Unlike every other country in the world, those decisions could be enforced in U. S. federal courts against the federal government.
  • LOST would be a big step toward United Nations global governance. The treaty’s reach extends far beyond international issues and disagreements into nations’ internal policies on a wide array of issues.  The treaty’s structure is designed to replace national decision making with UN decision making on these issues.
  • For the first time, the United Nations would have international taxing authority through LOST. Enough said.
  • LOST would accomplish backdoor implementation of the Kyoto Protocol and far beyond.

So, as if we didn’t have enough alligators in our swamp, the UN and the World Bank can always be counted on to add a few more. We really to need to drain the swamp.

Well, that’s what I’m thinking. What are your thoughts?

About these ads

21 thoughts on “The United Nations + The World Bank = One World Government

  1. Lost is the Jason Voorhees of ideas. Every time we think it’s dead, it returns, wielding a machete. This is a lesson for us. Global progressives are persistent.

    Another lesson we need to learn: Step one of progressivism is: Invent a crisis, the bigger the better.

    We would do well to silence the alarms. I don’t care what they tell me, I simply don’t believe them.

  2. I would love it if we just gave a big middle finger salute to the UN and kicked them the hell off of Manhattan. A league of democracies that actually influences nations toward real democracy (not one man, one vote, one time) and free market capitalism. Perhaps a League of Capitalist Democracies. Yeah…. I like that. In the meantime, the UN can kiss my….

  3. When you investigate the names and associations behind the United Nations, the World Bank, etc, you find the same people over and over again releasing alligators as it were to keep us distracted. Consider one Robert Zoellick, recently stepped down from being president of the World Bank: http://www.nndb.com/people/832/000123463/

    He donates to all your favorite republicans, but yet is a member of the World Wildlife Fund. He was Vice Chair at Goldman Sachs, Deputy Sec of State under Bush, a Bilderberger, a Trilateral (Ron Paul only politician besides Larry McDonald who’s ever spoken about Trilaterals and similar group’s influence on our nation), PNAC, CFR, Enron, Fannie Mae, the list goes on and on. Everything he’s done in his 30+ career in politics and think tanks was to get the US ready for one-world government. Rush jokes about the US getting out of the UN, but they will never, ever let that happen.

  4. Double Bummer. The representative republic we used to know, our line of defense, is waning, having been bought off by various amts. of ego boosting false claims and buckets of money. The World Bank, the World Wildlife Fund ( and cousins of same ilk), and the UN have figured out how to control it all.

    What you say here, ” about being pulled in 100 directions at the same time,” is exactly the case. It’s very Alinsky-like.

    Double triple bummer!

  5. The fact that we are being hit from more fronts than we can deal with strikes me as an effective strategy. Unfortunately, we are on the recieving end of it, rather than the inverse.

  6. We are being beaten down from so many angles Jim that it does make it hard to fight them off on all the issues at the same time. That is a great point and I just hope we aren’t reaching the point where conservatives are becoming too weary to fight any longer, and I am afraid the low turnout at all these primaries might be proof the conservatives are losing the will.

  7. The United Nations is the antithesis of national sovereignty.

    Over decades, the United States has been surrendering national sovereignty to the United Nations. The surrenders have come under both GOP and Dem administrations.

    And America sleeps on!

  8. “Our would be World Government wants the US and other developed nations to give up more of their wealth and sovereignty.to the benefit of the poorer nations.”

    Not to mention a bit of it for themselves.

    “Maybe they didn’t get the message that the so-called developed nations are broke.”

    In a way it’s a good thing, the less money we have the more people in the west start to demand our politicians be accountable with their spending.

    You may have heard, the carbon trading shindig in Europe has collapsed thanks to their economic woes. It would never have if they weren’t in such trouble.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s