House Liberals React as Expected

It didn’t take any time at all.  ” Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.),pounced on the shooting massacre in Tucson, Ariz., Sunday, promising to introduce legislation as soon as Monday targeting the high-capacity ammunition clip the gunman used.” Here’s the source. And, “Rep. Robert Brady (D-Pa.) reportedly plans to introduce legislation that would make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.”, source here.

Congresswoman McCarthy is focused on the 30 round clip that the shooter was using. Now, I have no idea why any law-abiding citizen needs a 30 round clip. But my question is would fewer people have been injured or killed if the shooter had had three smaller clips? If the answer is probably not, then what good is a law banning the larger clips?

The law that Congressman Brady is talking about is much more onerous and threatening to our freedom of speech.. These types of law I can tell from experience here in Venezuela are easily abused. The definition of what constitutes a threat becomes blurred and these laws become a tool to forbid disent against a government official or the government itself.

Hopefully, the Republican cotrolled House can put a stop to this dangerous initiative.

Categories: Uncategorized

11 thoughts on “House Liberals React as Expected

    1. Making us sick seems to be their job, Tony. What can I say? They want to distract us from what everyone should really be focused on, which is to save this country from falling into eternal darkness. We are on the ragged edge and some how we must stay focused.

  1. The left really let their hair down this week and showed their true lunacy.
    Ayn Rand was so prophetic in her book, “Atlas Shrugged,” where she describes a society falling into an abyss of crazy, irrational illogical thinking which happens to conform to the governments agenda of taking over more and more control.
    Since she grew up under the communists, she knew how it would unfold. Seeing other Americans react this way to a senseless tragedy leaves one feeling ill, but makes the point that we cannot stop pushing back against their madness.

    1. You said a mouth full, Dave. If the day ever comes when there is one too few people who care about the America our founding fathers provided to us, it will all be over. I promise I won’t stop resisting those that would destroy our country.

  2. Yep, their first and strongest reaction is to start chipping away at our liberties and freedoms. Never mind that our country is founded on those liberties and freedoms.

  3. They are going to use this attack to go after gun control, the fairness doctrine, and net neutrality. This is a gold mine of a “crisis” that the left does not intend to waste. I only hope that Republicans in the House do not go along with the Democrats simply to distance themselves from the shooter.

    1. What Brady has in mind is super bad. I wish with all my heart and soul that this tragedy had never occurred; but can you imagine what the Liberals could have done if the tragedy had happened when they also controlled the House?

  4. As usual, the fascist left’s first instinct is to further hinder and screw over the law-abiding over the actions of a lone nut.

    You see what that cretin really wants by banning the 30 round clip is to make sure that the law-abiding defending themselves with a gun have to stop and reload while the criminal doesn’t have to.

    “Now, I have no idea why any law-abiding citizen needs a 30 round clip.”

    I remember a long time ago watching a video of a fellow on the roof of his house during the LA riots, holding off a mob of people with an automatic weapon. It’s a far more difficult job to do that if you just have a crappy 6 shooter. Or picture yourself as a poor person living in the gang suburb of LA, a callous liberal would just tell you to move and suck it up, but why should you. The gang-bangers don’t give a crap about some retarded liberals gun control whining, so one option for you is to defend yourself with one of these high capacity guns, why should you be limited when your enemy is not.

    The other point is that if we suddenly decide that a 30-round clip is too much, why not ban the 20-round clip after that, the 15-round a few months after that. You see this is how the gun-hating crowd works, they start by caterwauling about automatic weapons and people think it’s reasonable, when they get that they’ll soon be pining for the next level down and down again. The ultimate objective being like living in a country like Australia where we aren’t allowed to carry shit to defend ourselves and yet for some incredulous [to the idiots that is] reason people are still getting shot and killed in our gun-free country.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s