Obama Puts Agenda 21 On Steroids

President Obama mentioned recently that he is preparing to tell all federal agencies for the first time that they should consider the impact on climate change before approving major projects, from pipelines to highways. It should have. I highly doubt he will implement his plan via a bill that congress must approve. He is much more like to do it through an executive order.

Stanley Kurtz at National Review Online tells about Obama’s next steps toward stacking you and packing you in high density urban centers (Agenda 21).

Last Friday’s headlines focused on President Obama’s address at Argonne National Laboratory, where he proposed to spend $2 billion on an energy-security trust fund for renewable fuel research. Obama boldly pledged “to shift our cars entirely . . . off oil.”

…on the day of Obama’s Argonne speech, the Department of Energy released a series of coordinated reportscalled “Transportation Energy Futures” (developed in cooperation with Argonne). This DOE project explores a variety of strategies designed to curb America’s greenhouse gas emissions up to 80 percent by about 2050.

I don’t know about you, but I didn’t hear about these DOE reports. I guess the MSM didn’t think they were very important. So, what is the DOE up to? Kurtz explains:

Arguably the most controversial of those reports covers the “effects of the built environment on transportation.” To put it plainly, the “built environment” report lays out strategies the federal government can use to force development away from suburbs and into cities, supposedly for the sake of reducing carbon dioxide emissions given off by all those suburban commuters. The Obama administration wants to force so-called smart growth policies on the country: get out of your car, stay out of the suburbs, move into small, tightly-packed urban apartment complexes, and walk or take public transportation instead of driving. (Bold added)

You can see what is coming, can’t you? The only projects that will get approval will be those in the cities. A developer wants to build a new subdivision in a suburb will find the permits denied or delayed indefinitely while the impact on climate change is reviewed and reviewed again. Need to add roads or schools to a suburb? Sorry! It would produce too much green house gases. The idea will be to make too expensive to live in the suburbs.

And, of course, there are all those federal grants that local politicians can’t turn down.

Kurtz has some thoughts on how to fight back:

How can these changes be fought? Publicity helps. Controversial policies like “smart growth” often operate under the public’s radar. Obama wants the energy debate to focus on benign-sounding research plans, while his administration’s interest in placing the massive power of federal funding behind urban densification strategies goes unnoticed.

The other way to block Obama’s plans is to have Congress cut funding for the Sustainable Communities Initiative. In particular, future funding for the Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant program ought to be eliminated. Although the cost of these planning grants is small, their potential impact is large, especially if the administration follows through with the built environment report’s option of conditioning a wide range of federal aid on local adherence to so-called smart-growth planning. (I described these troubling “sustainability” grants in “Obama’s Plan for Ohio.”)

Yours truly is not very optimistic that the House Republicans will use their power over the purse. All indications are that once again there will be no budget passed on the 27th of this month. That means there will be another Continuing Resolution passed to fund the government through September. The House Republicans could include no funding for “climate change reviews”. They could eliminate funds for those pesky government grants. They could cut funding for the DOE programs. And, of course, the Democrats could say no and shut down the government and blame it on the Republicans, in which case, the Republicans will fold in a heart beat.

So, the ultimate in central planning, Agenda 21, marches on.

Well, that’s what I’m thinking. What are your thoughts?

28 thoughts on “Obama Puts Agenda 21 On Steroids

  1. It would be curious to see how such policies will play out with his core constituencies. Around here, the upper middle class prefers low density semi-urban towns (like Berkeley, for instance), and people are already finding out that their cities are being built up by mandates that originate from the state. There are discussions about that and the increase in traffic in local papers, believe it or not. My guess is that they are not following the money all the way, because it’s probably a federal policy.
    Anyhow, I can see discontent brewing.

  2. I’d not seen the “Transportation Energy Futures Project” before either. Though undated, it was just put up last week. It speaks to the topic of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector which is the goal of the $2B (over 10 years) Energy Security Trust Obama requested last Friday.

    President O, since day one, has been bent on saving the planet from global warming. He swallowed that theory hook-line-and-sinker and will not change. His entire energy policy is predicated on it.

    The good news is that science is catching up with the IPCC and AGW alarmism. In 5-10 years AGW fanaticism will fade away as temperatures either remain unchanged or go down with the upcoming down-cycle of solar activity.

    As far as I can tell it is a framework; nothing more at this point.

    If we are lucky it will get only as much attention as Obama’s comprehensive energy blueprint from two years ago has got so far. Post Obama, common sense and sensible energy policy will return.

    Hopefully, that will happen before to much economic damage is done.

    1. AZ…Not so…”As far as I can tell it is a framework; nothing more at this point.” This “framework” is already being implemented and has been coming at us for the last 4 yrs. My area is covered up with it…and the tyranny of it is abominable. The local unelected Council of Government took the SCI – HUD money and has now hired contractors to do thermal imaging in “selected” neighborhoods to see whose homes are emitting greenhouse gases. They have hired contractors to inspect and assess private vehicle fleets in order to force them to retrofit and or replace diesel engines. They have “coded” 1.2 parcels of privately held land and are intending to collect data on all vehicles, land use, water use, energy use, and…also “educate” the public and students as to the brilliance of their plans.

      You may think this is just some “framework” to ignore….but it is entrenched in every major core city and surrounds in the nation. Go looking and you will find it. Take a look at your city Comprehensive Plan. Take a look at the Council of Governments in your area. Take a look at your State agencies. Just saying….ignore this at our peril. It MUST be stopped.

  3. Recently, FreeThinke made THIS COMMENT, which relates to Agenda 21 too:

    I’ve said it for DECADES: Look to be renting the equivalent of a government-assigned MORGUE DRAWER for eight hours of sedated sleep each day, the use of communal showers and toilets where time, hot water and toilet paper will be severely rationed. Look too for a government-assigned GYM LOCKER locker, where your government-issued UNIFORMS will be kept. Our lives will be weighed, measured and totally regimented to serve the interests of GOVERNMENT. Our existence will have no other purpose.

    Babies will be BRED in LABORATORIES, raised and “educated” by government-programmed ROBOTS. Anyone who follows an urge to step out of line will be EUTHANIZED.

    This IS where we’re headed IF the Progressive-Totalitarians gain the absolute power they have always sought since the inception of their accursed movement.

      1. Jim…copying your post to my elected officials and my Tea Party group here. Hoping they will listen to you and Stanley Kurtz. …I have tried and tried …4 op-eds in the paper, telling everyone I know, pleading with my elected officials. Thank you for this post. Maybe they will listen to you from afar!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s