Russian Sanctions: Never Underestimate the Stupidity of U.S./EU Leaders

From the day of the U.S/EU backed the coup against the Ukraine government, the propaganda machines of the U.S and Europe have worked over-time to make Russia responsible for the crisis. To be sure, Putin, like Obama, wasn’t going to let a good crisis go to waste.

How many times did the illegal Ukraine government, NATO, and U.S.generals claim to have proof that battalions of Russian troops had invaded eastern Ukraine? Yet, the proof was never forth coming because it never happened. The downing of the Malaysian jetliner was blamed on Russia, but only Putin consistently called for an international investigation. So, where is the investigation? As civil war broke out in eastern Ukraine, it was Putin who called for negotiations and the U.S/Eu that called for more sanctions. Negotiations were organized by Putin, which included the rebels but no representatives of the West. A cease-fire was achieved and has with only few disturbances. How did the U.S./EU respond to this achievement? They responded with more sanctions.

I’ve lost count of how many rounds of economic sanctions have taken place. Each time we are told by our fearless leaders that the newest sanctions are tougher than the previous round and that the added sanctions are going to hurt Russia’s economy so much that Mr. Putin will be forced to rectify Russia’s egregious actions. By now, Russia’s economy must be a complete bust, right?

What if, instead of doing serious harm to the Russian economy, the sanctions were actually harming the economies of the U.S. and Europe? The author of this Zero Hedge article thinks that is the case. On the latest package of western sanctions against Russia energy and financial sectors, he reports:

Exxon and Shell, for instance, are frozen in their operations with five top Russian oil/gas/pipeline companies: Gazprom, Gazprom Neft, Lukoil, Surgutneftegaz, and Rosneft.


The package was also described by Western corporate media as capable of“unnerving already jittery financial markets.” Well, they were not exactly“unnerved.” In Russia, the stocks of companies on the sanctions list went up. In the US, energy stocks went down.

Russian companies obviously have other options than working with the West’s Big Oil. Think China, India, Iran, and Brazil.

But the financial sector sanctions, which cut off Russia’s access to dollars and Euros, are surely taking their toll, right? Not so much, apparently.

Russia has a huge surplus of foreign capital – and is able to weather the storm. Germany – the EU’s top economy – on the other hand, is already suffering. Growth is already at a negative 0.2%. This is the way the hysterical sanction wind is blowing – further derailing EU economies. And no one is betting the EU will have the balls to stand up to Washington. Not in vassal-infested Brussels.

President Obama can’t win. His doctrine of “Leading from Behind” in the Middle East has failed miserably. Now, he has shown himself to be equally inept as he “Leads from In Front” in the U.S./EU economic war against Russia.  Under his “leadership”, the U.S./EU are more like the Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight. You have to wonder when they will get tired of shooting themselves in the foot?

Well, that’s what I’m thinking. What are your thoughts?

10 thoughts on “Russian Sanctions: Never Underestimate the Stupidity of U.S./EU Leaders

    1. well, five points the other way and Scotland would be free. I think they shouldn’t have brought in the youth vote. You never know with them, they’re as likely to vote one way as the other.

  1. If Obama can infect the west with his Eboli Spring we will all be too sick to pay attention to his multi pronged attack on this country and its economy along with his total disaster of a foreign policy.

  2. Everything you say is spot on. Russia are not the baddies here. They’ve consistently tried to stop the civil war. I haven’t heard Obama call for negotiations once. He wants Ukraine destablized and Germany are stupid enough to go with Obama on this one. The downing of flight MH17 was done by Kiev, not Russia, that’s why the world media have shut up about it.

    1. I suspect you are right on all counts. Sadly, I’m sure things would be much better under a President McCain or a President Romney, with the exception that our policies would be more transparent; but, it would be conflict just the same.
      Thanks for stopping by and sharing your thoughts, Limelite.

  3. I’m currently having a dispute with a dear Georgian friend over the situation in Ukraine (and Georgia) and US meddling. He wants Georgia to be in NATO because somebody else will fight the war they could never win and thus he can give Russia the finger. He is representative of the anti-Russian sentiments all these new NATO members have brought with them into the organization. But here’s the problem: NATO never used to give the USSR the finger. It behaved cautiously, soundly, careful not to provoke a casual conflict. Different organization today. As for sanctions, of course they do hurt the Russian people and the big shots, too, but the west has made Russia into such a bogey-man that they, too, are giving the finger. And the sanctions so obviously are a ruse enabling western financial interests (Soros must be in there somewhere) to get an edge up (Arctic, anyone?) while trying to shoot Russia in the knees. There is no good that will come of this. I hope in future the historians will lay it out faithfully so there can be an honest judgment of was the aggressor and who the defender just before wwIII.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s